SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Mad) 852

N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR
R. Anbarasi – Appellant
Versus
The Chief Engineer (Personnel) & Another – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:Mr. P. Raja, Advocate. For the Respondents:Mr. V. Radhakrishnan, Advocate.

Judgment :-

(Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the second respondent in letter No.956/Nir.3/Uda.4/Ko.va.vae/2004 dated 17.10.2004 and to quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to provide compassionate appointment to a suitable post.)

The prayer in this writ petition is to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the orders passed by the second respondent dated 17.10.2004 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to provide compassionate appointment to a suitable post to the petitioner.

2. The brief facts necessary for the disposal of this writ petition is that the petitioner's father, named S. Rajendran was employed as helper in the respondent Board and he died on 27.09.1996 by an accident while in service leaving behind the legal heirs, namely, the wife, three daughters, one son, mother and father. The petitioner's mother made a representation to the respondent Board requesting to provide employment assistance on compassionate ground to her. The said representation was rejected on 29.05.1998 by the second




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top