SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Mad) 1703

S.RAJESWARAN
K. Vijayan – Appellant
Versus
K. G. Kuppusamy & Others – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:For the Petitioner:T. Karunakaran, Advocate. For the Respondents:N. Venkatesh Vivekanandan, G.R. Swaminathan, Advocates.

Judgment :-

(Revision Petition filed against the order dated 10.3.2003, passed in E.P.No.29/2001 in O.S.No.342/1999, on the file of the Sub Judge, Gudiyatham, Vellore District.)

This revision petition has been filed against the order dated 10.3.2003 passed by the Sub-Judge, Gudiyatham, Vellore District in E.P.No.29/2001 in O.S.No.342/1999.

2. The 3rd respondent in E.P.No.29/2001 is the revision petitioner before this court. The 1st respondent herein is the plaintiff in O.S.No.342/1999 on the file of the Sub Judge, Gudiyatham for recovery of money. The suit was decreed on 4.2.2000 and the decree holder filed E.P.No.29/2001 praying to issue notice to the defendants in the suit under Order 21 Rule 37 of C.P.C. to realise the decree amount and in case of default to issue arrest warrant under Order 21 Rule 38 of C.P.C. and to commit them to civil prison to realise the decree amount. An affidavit was filed by the decree holder in E.P.No.29/2001 in support of the Execution Petition. It is stated by him that in I.A.No.533/1997 an order of Attachment Before Judgment was obtained by him and in spite of that the property was sold by the revision petitioner who is working as Manager in Petrol Bu










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top