S.RAJESWARAN
Kodiammal – Appellant
Versus
Sarangapani – Respondent
(Revision Petition filed against the order dated 31.10.2003, passed in I.A.No.156/2003 in O.S.No.80/2001, on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Nannilam.)
This Revision Petition has been filed against the order of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Nannilam, dated 31.10.2003 made in I.A.No.156/2003 in O.S.No.80/2001.
2. The plaintiff is the revision petitioner.
3. The revision petitioner filed O.S.No.80/2001 against the respondent herein praying for a judgment and decree for recovery of possession of the suit schedule property. She filed I.A.No.156/2003 under Order 6 Rule 17 to amend the measurements of the suit property on the basis of measurements given by the Advocate Commissioner's report. The trial court dismissed the Application on the ground of delay and aggrieved by the order, the above Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner. In spite of notice having been served on the respondent, there was no representation on behalf of the respondent either in person or through counsel.
5. In the plaint itself it was specifically stated by
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.