(PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order and decretal order dated 07.06.2004 made in I.A.No.255 of 2003 in A.S.No.28 of 2003 on the file of Sub Court, Chidambaram.)

This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order and decretal order dated 07.06.2004 made in I.A.No.255 of 2003 in A.S.No.28 of 2003 on the file of Sub Court, Chidambaram.

2. The respondents 6 and 7 in I.A.No.255 of 2003 in A.S.No.28 of 2003 are the revision petitioners. The first respondent herein filed the suit in O.S.No.99 of 2000 against the respondents 2 to 6 herein and also against the revision petitioners herein for a judgment and decree, declaring that the suit schedule properties are owned by him and also for recovery of possession. The revision petitioners resisted the suit by filing a written statement wherein, it was specifically averred that the seventh respondent in this revision petition should have been added as a necessary party and the suit should be dismissed for non-joinder of necessary parties, i.e., the seventh respondent herein. The Trial Court framed a specific issue as to whether the suit is bad for non joinder of the seventh respondent herein and by Judgment