SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Mad) 2541

K.VENKATARAMAN
Abdul Suban – Appellant
Versus
Syed Tharu Hussain – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:For the Petitioner:VR. Shanmuganathan, Advocate. For the Respondent:T.V. Sivakumar, Advocate.

Judgment :-

1. The present Revision is directed against the order of the learned District Munsif, Thirumangalam dated 24.3.2005 in I.A. No. 206 of 2005 in I.A. No. 57 of 2005 in O.S. No. 28 of 2005.

2. The petitioner herein filed the Suit against the respondent herein and others in O.S. No. 28 of 2005 on the file of the District Munsif, Thirumangalam for grant of permanent injunction restraining the defendants in the said Suit from interfering with his possession and enjoyment of the suit property. The respondent, who is the first defendant in the said Suit, has filed an Application to decide the issue of jurisdiction at the first instance. In the said Application, it has been stated that the suit property is a wakf property and hence, the District Munsif Court, Thirumangalam, where the Suit has been filed, has no jurisdiction to try the same. The petitioner, who was the respondent in the said Application, resisted the same stating that the suit property is not a wakf property and hence, the Suit filed before the said Court cannot be termed as not maintainable. The learned Trial Judge, after discussing the entire facts and circumstances of the case, allowed the said Application and






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top