SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Mad) 2405

S.MANIKUMAR
Rangasamy – Appellant
Versus
The Superintending Engineer & Others – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:For the Petitioner:N. Manokaran, Advocate. For the Respondents: N. Muthusamy, TNEB.

Judgment :-

(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to set aside the fair and decretal order dated 26.09.2005 in I.A.No.373 of 2005 in I.A.No.1127 of 2002 in O.S.No.233 of 2002 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Sankari (Full Additional Charge by the II Additional District Munsif, Salem).

Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order rejecting the prayer for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner.

2. The brief facts leading to the filing of the Civil Revision Petition are as follows :-

(i) The petitioner is the plaintiff in the suit. According to him, he is the owner of the service connection No.1111, which is situated in Survey No.209/10 of Kaveripatti Agraharam Village, Sankari Taluk, hereinafter called the suit service connection. He had applied for service connection for a well and had obtained necessary certificate from the Village Administrative Officer, Koneripatti Village. The certificate and other particulars were submitted to the Electricity Board authorities for the purpose of obtaining service connection for the well situated in his land. The plaintiff is also the owner of the land situated in S.F.No.208 a










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top