SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Mad) 2454

R.REGUPATHI
S. Dhananjeyan – Appellant
Versus
R. Mohan – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:For the Petitioner:S. Swamidoss Manoharan, Advocate. For the Respondent: -----

Judgment :-

(Prayer: Petition filed to set aside the order of dismissal passed on 03.02.2006 in C.M.P.No.5660 of 2005 by the learned XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai-600 015.)

The petitioner is the complainant in the private complaint. On conclusion of enquiry under Section 202 Cr.P.C, an order has been passed under Section 203 Cr.P.C dismissing the private complaint for an offence punishable under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. Aggrieved against the order impugned, the present revision has been filed before this Hon'ble Court.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits the petitioner has entered into an agreement with the respondent/accused for construction of a marriage hall, wherein, the understanding between the parties are that the petitioner will provide labour and the respondent will provide building materials. On completion of the construction, the profit will be shared by both of them. It is further alleged in the complaint that the work was undertaken and the building was almost completed. At the fag end of the completion, the respondent wanted to bring in some other person as a partner, which was disputed when there was a due of about Rs.8 lakhs from the respon

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top