SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Mad) 2883

S.ASHOK KUMAR
M. Thangavelu – Appellant
Versus
Perumayee & Others – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:For the Petitioner:Yamunan, Advocate. For the Respondents: ---

Judgment :-

(Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the orders of the Additional District Munsif, Namakkal, endorsed in the compromise memo filed in O.S.No.286 of 2005 dated 17.11.2005.)

Aggrieved over the order of the Additional District Munsif, Namakkal, endorsed in the compromise memo filed in O.S.No.286 of 2005 dated 17.11.2005 this civil revision petition has been filed.

2. Brief facts of the case are as follows:

The petitioner/plaintiff filed the suit against the defendants 1 to 14 for partition. He valued the suit at Rs.95,000/- as per the value of 1/20 share for which he is entitled. During the pendency of the suit, the plaintiff and defendants entered into a compromise memo. By virtue of the compromise memo the plaintiff paid money to each of the defendants who have released their shares in favour of the plaintiff. As per the compromise memo the first defendant received a total amount of Rs.6,00,000/-. The said amount is payable to herself as well as the defendants 4 to 14.

3. The learned Additional District Munsif, Namakkal passed an impugned order on 17.11.2005 stating that according to the compromise memo the value of the suit c


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top