SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Mad) 2691

S.ASHOK KUMAR
J. Uma Maheswari – Appellant
Versus
S. Peter – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:For the Petitioner:R. Gandhi, Senior counsel, V.P. Sengottuvel, Advocate. For the Respondent:V. Ayyadurai, Advocate.

Judgment :-

(Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 1.8.2006 made in I.A.No.1470 of 2006 in O.S.No.414 of 2006 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Poonamallee.)

Aggrieved over the order of injunction granted by the learned District Munsif, Poonamallee made in I.A.No.1470 of 2006 in O.S.No.414 of 2006, this civil revision petition has been filed.

2. Brief facts of the case are as follows:

The respondent/plaintiff has filed O.S.No.414 of 2006 and the same is pending before the District Munsif, Poonamallee. The prayer in the suit is for bare injunction. The respondent has also filed I.A.No.1470 of 2006 for ad-interim injunction restraining the defendant/petitioner herein, his men and agent from interfering with the possession of the respondent.

3. The learned District Munsif, Poonamallee passed an order as follows:

"Heard. Perused the documents. prima facie made out. Hence injunction till 18.9.2006. Notice to the respondent including private notice also."

4. Aggrieved over the said order, this civil revision petition has been filed.

5. Mr.R.Gandhi, the learned Senior counsel appearing for the revision petitioner would cont












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top