P.SATHASIVAM
Krishnaveni & Others – Appellant
Versus
Gopal Pandithar – Respondent
(Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the orders dated 07.02.2006 made in I.A.Nos.62 and 63 of 2006 respectively in O.S.No.116 of 2001 on the file of Additional District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Chengam.)
Common Order:
The defendants in O.S.No.116 of 2001 on the file of Additional District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Chengam are the revision petitioners. The plaintiff/respondent herein filed the said suit for declaration and delivery of possession of the suit property. The defendants filed a written statement disputing the claim of the plaintiff. After examination of D.W.1 on the side of the defendants, the plaintiff has filed two applications, one to recall D.W.1 and another to reopen the evidence on the side of defendants. In the affidavits filed in support of the above petitions, it is stated that the suit is in part-heard stage and the evidence on the side of defendants was closed and DWs.1 and 2 were examined and the suit was posted for plaintiff’s side evidence. It is further stated that the counsel on record omitted to put some vital questions to DW.1; hence, it is just and necessary to reopen the evidence on th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.