SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Mad) 3260

K.VENKATARAMAN
Pichaimani – Appellant
Versus
C. Selvarani & Another – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:For the Petitioner:P. Vairava Sundaram, Advocate. For the Respondents:K. Srinivasan, Advocate.

Judgment :-

1. The present Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order of the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Natham dated 21.9.2006 made I.A. No.163 of 2006 in O.S. No.26 of 2006.

2. The short matrix of the case is as follows:

The first respondent herein has filed the Suit in O.S. No.26 of 2006 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Natham against the petitioner for recovery of certain amount on the basis of the promissory note executed by the petitioner herein in favour of the first respondent. In the said Suit, the petitioner being the defendant has filed an Application in I.A. No.163 of 2006 to implead one Chinnappan, the second respondent herein, who is the husband of the first respondent, as a proposed party in the Suit. The said Application has been dismissed by the Court below and the present revision is directed against the said order.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has strenuously contended that the petitioner being the defendant in the said Suit has filed a written statement stating that he has not borrowed any amount from the first respondent herein/plaintiff and the transaction was only between the petitioner and















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top