SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Mad) 3476

R.BANUMATHI
The Federal Bank Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sundari Bhaskaran – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:For the Petitioner:V. Girish Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondent:S. Vijayakumar, Advocate.

Judgment :-

(Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of C.P.C against the order dated 27.06.2006 made in E.A.No.2381 of 2006 in E.P.No.763 of 2005 by the IX Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai, as stated therein.)

This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 27.06.2006 passed by IX Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai in E.A.No.2381 of 2006 in E.P.No.763 of 2005 in O.S.No.1525 of 2000, raising the order of Attachment. The Decree Holder is the Revision Petitioner.

2. The Petitioner Bank has obtained a money decree in O.S.No.1525 of 2000. The Decretal amount is more than Rs.8,00,000/-. For realising the amount, the Petitioner Bank has filed E.P.No.763 of 2005 and attachment of salary of the Respondent was ordered. The Respondent is working as Lecturer in Queens Mary College. The Manager (Accounts) is the Garnishee.

3. The Respondent has filed E.A.No.2381 of 2006 to raise the order of Attachment of salary. According to the Respondent, she has already suffered an order of Attachment made by the Recovery Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal, Chennai in D.R.C.No.231 of 2000 wherein Attachment of salary has been effected continuously for a period of 24 months. The ord












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top