SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Mad) 3472

S.ASHOK KUMAR
V. K. Bhuvaneswari – Appellant
Versus
N. Venugopal – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:For the Petitioner:M. Sathyanarayanan, Advocate. For the Respondent:Hemalatha, Advocate.

Judgment :-

(Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal orders made in I.A.No.17 of 2003 in H.M.O.P.No.27 of 2002 on the file of the Sub Court, Cheyyar, Tiruvannamalai. )

Aggrieved over the fair and decreetal orders made in I.A.No.17 of 2003 in H.M.O.P.No.27 of 2002 on the file of the Sub Court, Cheyyar, Tiruvannamalai, this civil revision petition is filed.

2. Brief facts of the case are as follows:

The revision petitioner is the wife and the respondent is her husband. The respondent has filed H.M.O.P.No.27 of 2002 on the file of the Sub Court, Cheyyar, Tiruvannamalai for divorce on the ground of desertion under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act. He has also filed an application in I.A. No. 17 of 2003 to subject the petitioner, respondent and the child for D.N.A. test to prove that the respondent was not the father of the child.

3. After contest, the application filed by the respondent has been allowed.

4. Aggrieved over the said order, the present civil revision petition is filed.

5. Mr.M.Sathyanarayanan, the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner would contend that during the subsistence of marriage an























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top