SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Mad) 117

D.MURUGESAN
K. Thakshinamoorthy and Another – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:Parthasarathy, S. Thyagarajan, Advocates.

Judgment :-

The Order of the Court was as follows :

The defendants in O.S. No. 69 of 1999 in I.A. No. 63 of 1999 are the petitioners in this revision petition. The respondent is the plaintiff. The present revision petition has been filed as against the order of the learned First Additional Subordinate Judge, Madurai made in I.A. No. 279 of 1999 in I.A. No. 63 of 1999 in O.S. No. 69 of 1999. The parties are referred to as they are arrayed in the suit.

2. The plaintiff State Bank of India, Arasaradi Branch, Madurai represented by its Branch Manager filed a suit against the defendants for a judgment and decree for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from alienation/selling the scheduled properties or to create any charge over the same. Pending the suit, the plaintiff also filed I.A. No. 63 of 1999 seeking for interim injunction restraining the defendants from alienating the properties.

3. The defendants filed I.A. No. 279 of 1999 for a direction under Order VII, Rule 11 of C.P.C. to reject the plaint filed in O.S. No. 69 of 1999 as not maintainable. By filing a common counter, the defendants also prayed for vacation of the order of ad interim injunction granted in favour of t
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top