SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Mad) 728

P.SATHASIVAM
A. Abdul Rahim – Appellant
Versus
Julaiga Beevi and another – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:Mr. S. Rajendrakumar for Mr. K. Yamunan, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. R. Thirugnanam, Advocate for Respondents.

Judgment :-

1. Defendant in O.S.No.17 of 1985 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Pondicherry at Karaiakal is the appellant herein. The plaintiffs/respondents herein filed the said suit for a preliminary decree declaring that the plaintiffs and defendant are entitled to 3,7 and 14 shares in the estate of the deceased Abdul Gafoor. The learned Additional District Judge, Pondicherry at Karaikal on the basis of the oral and documentary evidence, decreed the suit; hence the present appeal by the defendant.

2. The case of the plaintiffs/respondents is briefly stated hereunder:- The first plaintiff is the wife of the deceased Abdul Gafoor, son of Abdul Gani Rawthar. The 2nd plaintiff is the daughter of the first plaintiff and the deceased Abdul Gafoor. The defendant is the son of the said deceased Abdul Gafoor. The said Abdul Gafoor died intestate at Bombay on 9.10.80. On the death of Abdul Gafoor, as his only legal heirs, the plaintiffs and the defendant are entitled to inherit the estate of the deceased as per the Mahomedan Law of succession. At the time of filing of the suit, the defendant was residing in France and the property at Ambagarathur and Nallazhundur are in the po













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top