The Order of the Court was as follows :

The petitioner had filed five interlocutory applications pending the appeal filed by him against the dismissal of his suit for bare injunction in respect of his alleged rights in the Sathyam Theatre Complex. The five applications are, for interim injunction restraining the respondent from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession of the restaurant and parking stands in the theatre complex (CMP 986/2000), interim direction to restore to the petitioner, the five restaurants and parking stands with all amenities in the three theatres in Sathyam theatre complex (CMP 987/2000), interim injunction restraining the respondent from commencing or running any canteen and parking stands collecting parking charges (CMP 1026/2000), for receiving documents (CMP 1027/2000) and finally, another petition for receiving documents (CMP 1028/2000).

2. The petitioner's case is that the respondent's partnership concern leased out the restaurants and parking stands in the Sathyam Theatre Complex under the document dated 25-12-1973. The document sets down the understanding between the parties. The following were the areas leased out : (1) Main re