D.MURUGESAN
Arunachalam S – Appellant
Versus
Managing Director, Southern Structurals, Madras and Others – Respondent
The Order of the Court was as follows :
The petitioner was employed as Assistant (Trainee) in the 1st respondent company on June 2, 1984 for a period of two years. Since he was a Post Graduate Degree holder at the time of joining, he was posted as Assistant in the personnel department against the permanent vacancy. During the period of two years, the petitioner was treated as a full member of the department and was allotted duties equivalent to other staff of personnel department. He was paid a consolidated stipend of Rs. 650/- till his probation was declared on June 8, 1986. The petitioner resigned his services with effect from the closing of August 12, 1991. On his resignation, the petitioner was paid all statutory dues to which the petitioner was entitled to, except the gratuity for the period from June 2, 1984 to June 7, 1986. The total amount of gratuity due for the period from June 2, 1984 to June 7, 1986 works out to Rs. 1, 889.80.
The petitioner made a claim before the Assistant Commissioner of Labour, the Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the definition of Section 2(e) of "the Act" only
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.