SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Mad) 1593

M.KARPAGAVINAYAGAM
Senthamarai – Appellant
Versus
S. Krishnaraj and Others – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:K. Asokan, A. Kothandaraman, S. Jayakumar, Advocates.

Judgment :-

The Order of the Court was as follows :

S. Krishnaraj, the husband becomes an approver against his own wife Senthamarai in a criminal proceeding. Having failed in her attempt to prevent the trial Court from tendering pardon to her husband and declaring him as an approver, the petitioner/wife is before this Court through this criminal revision petition challenging the order granting pardon.

On the complaint of one Dhanalakshmi Ammal, a case was registered against the petitioner Senthamarai and her husband Krishnaraj and others alleging that they fabricated the false and forged documents, the Will and Deed of Assumption with forged signature of the said Dhanalakshmi Ammal and her husband Nataraj Chettiar in order to get the entire properties in favour of Senthamarai and to have total control over the Institutions run by the Trust and got it registered with the Sub-Registrar at Rajapalayam on 4-7-1995. After finishing investigation, on 18-11-1999 the charge-sheet was filed against Senthamarai/wife, Krishnaraj/husband, Palani Murugan, the Car Driver and one Balasubramaniam, the Sub-Registrar of Rajapalayam. The case was taken on file in C.C. No. 2 of 2000. Before the commence



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top