SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Mad) 1604

R.JAYASIMHA BABU, A.K.RAJAN
Commissioner of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
K. Muthu – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:T. Ravi Kumar, Advocate.

Judgment :-

A.K. RAJAN, J.

The question that is referred is,

"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal is right in holding that the income from Malaysia cannot be subjected to tax in accordance with the agreement for avoidance of double taxation of income and prevention of fiscalevasion of tax, entered into between Government of India and the Government of Malaysia?"

2. In a number of cases this Court has held this issue against the revenue and in favour of the assessee. One such instance is the case reported in CIT v. VR.S.RM Firm wherein this Court has held that the income derived from Malaysia cannot be clubbed for the purpose of taxation in India. Hence, this question is answered against the revenue and in favour of the assessee.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top