SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Mad) 996

B.AKBAR BASHA KHADIRI
P. R. Shankar Rao – Appellant
Versus
Joseph And Joseph Regis Kalingarayar – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:For the Petitioner:G.R. Edmund, Advocate. For the Respondent: ---

Judgment :-

The instant Crl.O.P. is to quash the proceedings in C.C. No. 413 of 1997 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No. 1. Tuticorin.

2. This Crl.O.P. has arisen in this way :-

A complaint has been preferred by the respondent herein against five accused. Accused No. 3, M/s. Karthick Fisheries, and Accused No. 5, M/s. Karthick Multi Packs Pvt. Ltd., are companies. Accused No. 1, N. K. Kumar, is the Managing Director of Accused No. 3 and one of the Directors of Accused No. 5. Accused No. 2 is the Director of Accused No. 3 and Accused No. 5. Accused No. 4 is also a Director of Accused No. 5. Accused No. 3, M/s. Karthick Fisheries incurred debt to the tune of Rs. 42,31,737.00 with the complainant/respondent herein in purchasing prawns. The accused made certain payments. As on April, 1996, the outstanding due from Accused No. 3 was Rs. 22,12,000/-. As the Chairman-cum-Managing Director of Accused No. 5, i.e. M/s. Karthick Multi Packs Pvt. Ltd., Accused No. 1 issued a cheque for the said amount on 14-6-1997 drawn on Bank of Madura Ltd., T. Nagar, Madras. The Complainant/respondent herein presented the cheque through the Indian Bank, Melur, Tuticorin. On 2-7-1997, the cheque was r



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top