SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Mad) 159

S.S.SUBRAMANI
N. R. Gopal – Appellant
Versus
K. G. Banumathi and Another – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:S. Subbiah, R. Rajagopalan, (For No. 1), Advocates.

Judgment :-

The Order of the Court was as follows :

Both these Revisions are filed by the husband in H.M.O.P. No. 43 of 1999, on the file of Family Court at Madurai.

2. Petitioner herein filed H.M.O.P. No. 43 of 1999, seeking divorce of the first respondent herein on various grounds. Pending application, first respondent herein filed I.A. Nos. 74 and 75 of 1999. In IA No. 74 of 1999, first respondent herein wanted to restrain the husband, petitioner herein, from redeeming a property scheduled in that petition by discharging an 'othi', executed in favour of second respondent in that I.A.

3. In support of that I.A., first respondent has filed an affidavit stating that the petitioner herein is working as a driver in a Government undertaking and is getting a monthly income of not less than Rupees 5,000/-. She has further said that in 1997 they fixed a house on 'othi' which belonged to the second respondent in that application. The 'othi' amount was Rs. 34,000/-. Since the husband was not in possession of sufficient funds, the ornaments belonging to the wife were sold for raising funds, and thus obtained 'othi' of the house, where they are residing together. In fact, the sum and substance





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top