SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Mad) 554

Y.VENKATACHALAM
A. C. C. , Tuticorin – Appellant
Versus
Court of The Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:Mrs. Sumathi Sankar, K. Rajenan, M.B. Gopal, S.S. Sundar, T.R. Rajaraman, Advocates.

Judgment :-

The Order of the Court is as follows :-

Invoking Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner herein has filed the present writ petition seeking for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the order passed by the 1st respondent in O.P. No. 154/92, dated 23-10-1992 and to quash the same as without jurisdiction and unconstitutional in so far as this petitioner is concerned.

2.In support of the writ petition, the petitioner herein has filed an affidavit wherein he has narrated all the facts and circumstances that forced them to file the present writ petition and requested this court to allow the writ petition as prayed for. Per contra, though no counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 3 and 4 argued the matter and pleaded that the writ petition has to be dismissed for want of merits.

3.Heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties. I have perused the contents of the affidavit together with all other relevant material documents available on record in the form of typed set of papers. I have also taken into consideration the various points raised by


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top