SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Mad) 153

S.S.SUBRAMANI
Rani Mohanraj and Another – Appellant
Versus
P. Rajarathinam – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:V. Ramasubramaniam, R. Swaminathan, Advocates.

Judgment :-

The Order of the Court was as follows :

Defendants 8 and 9 in C. S. 996 of 1998 on the file of II Additional District Munsif, Tiruchirapalli are the revision petitioners. This revision is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India.

2. Relevant facts which necessitated filing this revision may be summarised thus : One Mohanraj died on 23-11-1997. Respondent herein is his brother. First petitioner is the widow of Mohanraj and second petitioner is first petitioner's father. First petitioner in her marriage with Mohanraj had given birth to a female child, whose name is Varsha Dhanashri. She was born on 23-2-1991.

3. Respondent herein alleging that Mohanraj appointed him along with first petitioner as guardian of minor Varsha Dhanashri, within two weeks from the date of death of his brother Mohanraj, filed O.P. (Guardian and Wards) to declare him as guardian of minor daughter and to have her custody and also properties which belong to Mohanraj but bequeathed under Will to his daughter. While filing Guardian and Wards Petition before District Court, Trichy, he also moved for interim injunction restraining first petitioner and her parents from interfering in the possession
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top