SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Mad) 280

R.BALASUBRAMANIAN
Superintending Engineer and Others – Appellant
Versus
Thangaprakasam – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:V. Rengapashyam, J. Pothiraj, Advocates.

Judgment :-

The Order of the Court was as follows :

The revision petitioners are the defendants in O.S. No. 664/96 on the file of the District Munsif, Ponneri and the respondent is the sole plaintiff in that suit. That suit was filed for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from digging or erecting any post in the suit property and drawing high tension supply line in and over the suit property. Pending suit, the plaintiff filed an application namely, I.A. No. 1701/96 for an interim order which is more or less on the same lines as prayed for in the plaint. The learned trial Judge granted an order of injunction as prayed for. The defendants appealed in C.M. A. No. 28/97 on the file of the Sub-Judge, Thiruvallur and the learned appellate Judge dismissed the said appeal on merits. Hence the present revision before this Court at the instance of the defendants in the suit.

2. I heard Mr. V. Rengapashyam, learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioners and Mr. J. Pothiraj, learned counsel appearing for the respondent in this revision. The plaintiff is shown to be the owner of various extent of lands comprised in Survey Numbers 318/2, 321/1 and 322/3. The grievance of the










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top