SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Mad) 307

S.S.SUBRAMANI
Packiyam Ammal and Others – Appellant
Versus
Pattu Ammal and Others – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:R. N. Kothandraman, Advocate.

Judgment :-

Plaintiffs in O.S. No. 308 of 1981, on the file of Sub Court, Vridnachalam, are the appellants herein.

2. One Muthappa Udayar had two sons and a daughter, by name Chinnadurai, Subramania Udayar and Pattu Ammal. Muthappa Udayar died in 1965 leaving behind his widow Pakkiyam Ammal two sons daughter named above. Chinnadurai died in 1968 issueless and unmarried. The suit for partition was filed by the widow of Muthappa Udayar as first plaintiff and the wife of Subbmania Udayar and his children born in that marriage, as plaintiffs 2 to 4. Subramania Udayar is the first defendant and Pattu Ammal, daughter, is the second defendant. First plaintiff claimed half share and second plaintiff claimed 5/24 share in the property, and they wanted all the plaint schedule items to be divided by metes and bounds. In the B Schedule, there are 11 items of immovable properties. It is alleged in the plaint that all the items belong to the joint family of Muthappa Udayar, and after the death of Muthappa Udayar first defendant came into management of the same. 'C' Schedule items are movables. A claims as also made by third plaintiffs that he is entitled to get future maintenance from first defen

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top