SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Mad) 450

High Court of Judicature at Madras
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B. AKBAR BASHA KHADIRI
C.K.P. Memmon And Others - Appellant
Versus
K.P. Sulaiman And Others - Respondents
Cri.R.C.No.130 of 1998 and Cri M.P.Nos.1052 and 1053 of 1998
Decided On : 22 April 1999

Appearing Advocates:For the Petitioners:K. Sukumaran, Advocate. For the Respondents:S. Ashokkumar, (for No. 1) R. Natarajan Addl. Public Prosecutor Pondichery (for No. 2), Advocate.

The Executive Magistrate has no jurisdiction to attach the subject of dispute under Section 146(1) of the Cr.P.C. without first conducting an enquiry under Section 145(4) of the Cr.P.C.

Headnote:

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973 - SECTION 145, 146 - FACTUAL POSSESSION - ATTACHMENT OF SUBJECT OF DISPUTE - PROCEDURE - EMERGENCY - NO DECISION POSSIBLE AS TO POSSESSION - NONE OF THE PARTIES IN POSSESSION - DUTY OF EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE - ENQUIRY - EVIDENCE - DISCRETION.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, who were in possession of the disputed property, challenged the order of the Executive Magistrate attaching the property under Section 146(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) on the ground that the Magistrate had not conducted an enquiry as required under Section 145(4) of the Cr.P.C.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the Executive Magistrate had no jurisdiction to proceed under Section 146 of the Cr.P.C. without first conducting an enquiry under Section 145(4) of the Cr.P.C. and that the impugned order was passed without any material to show that an emergency situation had arisen or that none of the parties were in possession.

Issues: Whether the Executive Magistrate had jurisdiction to attach the subject of dispute under Section 146(1) of the Cr.P.C. without first conducting an enquiry under Section 145(4) of the Cr.P.C.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the provisions of Sections 145 and 146 of the Cr.P.C. and held that the Executive Magistrate is empowered to attach the subject of dispute under Section 146(1) of the Cr.P.C. only in three cases: (i) if it is a case of emergency; (ii) if none of the parties was in possession or (iii) if no decision is possible as to the possession. The court further held that before exercising his powers under Section 146, Cr.P.C. It is incumbent upon the learned Executive Magistrate to observe the procedure laid down under S. 145(4) Cr.P.C.

Final Decision: The court allowed the revision petition and quashed the order of the Executive Magistrate attaching the subject of dispute. The Magistrate was directed to call for written statements from both the parties, adopt the procedure laid down under Section 145(4) of the Cr.P.C., and then pass orders.

Judgment :-

The counter petitioner Nos. 2 to 5 before the Executive Magistrate have come forward with the instant Criminal R.C.

2. This criminal revision has arisen in this (sic) One Ibrahim had a first wife. Through her, he had a son by name Aboobacker. Ibrahim married one Kadeessu as the second wife. On 31-1-1953 Ibrahim executed a sale alienating the disputed property in favour of his second wife Kadeessu. Ibrahim died during 1958. Aboobacker was looking after the affairs of Kadeesu, and managed and maintained the properties. Aboobacker appears to have created some documents in favour of the first respondent herein by name Sulaiman. Sulaiman had obtained a Bogus possession certificate from the Tahsildar and he claims possession of the disputed properties.

3. Petitioners one to three herein are the children of Kadeesu. Petitioners 1 to 3 herein were living in a rented house elsewhere. Since the landlord wanted them to vacate the property they constructed a residential building in the suit property and they are residing there for the past three months prior to filing of the petition on 26-12-97 the first counter petitioner Sulaiman, who is the first respondent herein had trespassed into the property and demolished the house, regarding which a dispute arose and the matter was complained to the second respondent to the station House Officer Pallore Police Station, Mahe. The Station House Officer referred the matter to the Executive Magistrate under S. 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Executive Magistrate issued Notice under S. 145(1), Cr.P.C. directing all the counter petitioners i.e., petitioners 1 to 3 herein and the first respondent herein to appear before him on 7-1-98 at 3-00 p.m. to put their written statements. The parties appeared and petitioners herein submitted the written statement on 21-1-98 itself. On the same day, the Executive Magistrate passed order to the effect that no settlement was arrived at between the parties regarding possession and directed the petitioners herein to surrender the vacant possession to the station House Officer, Pallor Police Station, Mahe and directed the Tahsildar. Mahe to take vacant possession of the land in R.S. No. 36/10 and keep the land in his custody till the ownership of the land is decided by the competent Court. It is this order that is being questioned by the petitioners 1 to 3 herein.

4. Heard both sides. The learned Executive Magistrate has exercised his powers under S. 146(1) Cr.P.C. Section 146 Cr.P.C. is corollary to S. 145, Cr.P.C. It is only continuation of the proceedings under S. 145, Cr.P.C. The executive Magistrate is empowered under S. 146(1) Cr.P.C. to attach the subject of dispute in three cases, namely (i) if it is a case of emergency; (ii) if none of the parties was in possession or (iii) if no decision is possible as to the possession. Before exercising his powers under S. 146, Cr.P.C. It is incumbent upon the learned Executive Magistrate to observe the procedure laid down under S. 145(4) Cr.P.C. Section 145 recites as under :-

145, Procedure where dispute concerned land or water is likely to cause breach of peace.

(1) Whenever an Executive Magistrate is satisfied from a report of a police officer or upon other information that a dispute is likely to cause a breach of the peace exists concerning any land or water or the boundaries thereof, within his local jurisdiction, he shall make an order in writing. Stating the grounds of his being so satisfied, and requiring the parties concerned in such dispute to attend his Court in person or by pleader, on a specified date and time, and put in written statements of their respective claims as respects the fact of actual possession of the subject of dispute.

(2) to (4) ..........................

(4) the Magistrate shall then without reference to the merits or the claims of any of the parties to a right to possess the subject of dispute peruse the statements so put in, hear the parties, receive all such eviden




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top