SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Mad) 525

S.S.SUBRAMANI
S. Suresh and Others – Appellant
Versus
Isabal Thomas and Another – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:P. B. Ramanujam, Advocate.

Judgment :-

The Order of the Court was as follows :

Landlord, who was defeated in both the Courts below have come to this Court challenging the correctness of orders under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.

2. According to the landlord, the concurrent findings of the authorities below are illegal, improper and irregular and therefore the same are liable to be interfered with under the revisional powers of this Court.

3. The only ground for eviction was that the respondent is a nuisance both to his neighbours and also the other occupants of the building and liable to be evicted under Section 10(2)(v) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.

4. It is alleged in the rent control petition that by conducting workshop in the scheduled premises the noise is disturbing the locality and the smell of the paint is also affecting the atmosphere. It is also alleged that some of the employees of the respondent are taking bath openly in the premises naked and it is causing annoyance to the persons residing in the neighbourhood and in the vicinity. The premises is also not kept clean and that is also an added reason for the nuisance.

5. The said allega




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top