SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Mad) 653

S.S.SUBRAMANI
Chitra Devi – Appellant
Versus
Chembagavalli – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:Chitra Sampath, V. Raghavachari, Advocates.

Judgment :-

The Order of the Court was as follows :

Plaintiff in O.S. No. 81 of 1993 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Pondicherry is the appellant herein. The said suit was filed by her against her father and her sister for declaration declaring that the settlement executed by her father is valid to an extent of 1/8th share and the remaining property is to be partitioned by metes and bounds after the death of her father.

2. The facts could be summarised as hereunder :

First defendant Murugesa Pillai was married to plaintiff's mother one Rajalakshmi. It is averred in the plaint that the parties belong to Pondicherry and are governed by the Pondicherry Customary Hindu Law. The suit property was acquired by the first defendant and as per Customary law, his daughters are the apparent heirs to inherit the suit property. Two years after the birth of the plaintiff, the first defendant and his wife namely mother of the plaintiff got separated and a divorce was also granted. When the plaintiff coming to know that her father is going to execute a settlement deed in favour of the second defendant, she issued a notice not to do so. At that time, the first defendant challenged the p






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top