V.KANAGARAJ
S. Mohammed Iqubal – Appellant
Versus
M. Padmanabhan – Respondent
The Order of the Court was as follows :
The above Civil Revision Petition is directed against the judgment and decree dated 26-3-1994 made in R.C.A. No. 17 of 1992 by the Rent Control Appellate Authority and the Court of Subordinate Judge, Ranipet, thereby reversing the fair and decretal order dated 18-8-1992 made in R.C.O.P. No. 28 of 1986 by the Rent Controller and the District Munsif, Arakkonam.
2. The original petition for eviction of the tenant has been filed by the landlord on four grounds viz. (1) wilful default in payment of rent, under Section 10(2)(i); (2) for committing acts of waste by the tenant thereby impairing materially the value or utility of the building, under Section 10(2)(iii); (3) the tenant being guilty of such acts which are nuisance to the occupiers of the other portions, under Section 10(2)(v) and (4) requiring additional accommodation by the landlord (who is occupying a part of the building) under Section 10(3)(c), all under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960.
3. The Rent Controller, rejecting the claim of the landlord on the first three grounds has allowed the petition on the sole ground of requiring the premises for ad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.