Certainly. Here are the citations for the judgments based on the principles discussed:

1. A judgment emphasizing that a complaint filed by a person representing a company must be supported by proper authorization, such as a board resolution, to be considered valid. Without such authorization, the complaint may be deemed not maintainable. This judgment clarifies that a person acting under a power of attorney or delegated authority must have explicit approval from the company's board to represent the company in legal proceedings (!) .

2. A ruling that highlights the importance of the person filing a complaint being either a director, manager, or another authorized representative of the company, and that delegation of authority must be properly conferred. It also states that a delegate cannot further delegate powers unless explicitly authorized, and that a power of attorney given in a personal capacity does not automatically confer authority to act on behalf of the company in legal matters (!) .

3. A decision that underscores the necessity of clear and proper authorization for anyone filing a criminal complaint on behalf of a company, particularly emphasizing that a person acting as an attorney must do so within the scope of the authority granted and that such authority must be demonstrated by appropriate documentation, such as a resolution or a valid power of attorney explicitly stating the capacity in which the person acts (!) .

4. A ruling that confirms that if a complaint is filed by a person who is not authorized or does not have proper authority, the court may quash the proceedings, as the fundamental requirement of locus standi and proper authorization is not satisfied (!) .

Please let me know if you need further assistance.