SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Mad) 300

M.KARPAGAVINAYAGAM
Bay Leathers Exports Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Saileela – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:S. Uthirasamy, N. K. Sankaranarayanand, Advocates.

Judgment :-

The question that arises for consideration in this revision petition is whether the appellate Court under Section 389(1), Cr.P.C. could suspend the sentence of fine, while admitting the appeal and, if so, under what circumstances ?

2. The facts leading to the filing of this revision are as follows :- The petitioner filed a complaint against the respondent for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, since the cheque issued for a sum of Rs. 5, 23, 700/- by the respondent was dishonoured and that the cheque amount was not paid despite and demand made in the statutory notice. After trial, the respondent was convicted to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months and to pay a fine of Rs. One lakh, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one year and she was further directed to pay Rs. 95, 000/- to the complainant as compensation out of the fine amount and the remaining amount to be deposited in Court as fine to the Government. This judgment was dated 24-4-1997. On the same date, the respondent, the accused paid Rs. 5, 000/- being the fine amount and Rs. 5, 000/- towards compensation. The respondent filed a petition for extension of time for pa



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top