SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Mad) 220

M.KARPAGAVINAYAGAM
N. Ramachandran – Appellant
Versus
Munisamy and Others – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:N. Srinivasan, S. Raveendran (For Nos. 4, 6), Advocates.

Judgment :-

This civil revision petition is directed against the fair and final order passed in O.S.No. 343 of 1994 on the file of the Court of Subordinate Judge, Srivilluputtur on 9-12-1996.

2. The petitioner who is the plaintiff filed the suit in O.S.No. 343 of 1994 on the file of Principal Sub Judge, Srivilliputtur seeking for the relief of reopening of the partition deed dated 11-12-1991 and for effecting a fresh partition in respect of all the suit properties and allotting the petitioner's share of 1/7 in the suit properties and for mesne profits.

3. The petitioner paid a fixed Court fee of Rs. 200/- under Section 37(2) of Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") and for mesne profits a court-fee of Rs. 8/- was paid under Section 22 of the Act.

4. The respondents herein resisted the claim by filing a written statement. When the suit was pending, a check-slip was issued for the deficit court-fee to the tune of Rs. 73, 373.75 in the suit. The petitioner filed objection to the said check-slip stating that the relief sought for in the suit is only for re-opening of the partition deed and not for cancellation and that therefore, Sectio





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top