SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Mad) 223

P.SATHASIVAM
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
A. Janardhanan and Another – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:B. S. Ghanadesikan, Karthikeyan, Advocates.

Judgment :-

Aggrieved against the award of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Madras Branch in OAII/22/93 dated 30-6-1995, Southern Railway represented by its General Manager, Chennai-3 has filed the present appeal under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 before this Court.

2. The respondents herein applicants 1 and 2 before the Railway Claims Tribunal have made a claim for Rs. 2 lakhs as compensation alleging that their son J. Sunil died in the railway accident which occurred on 1-6-1993 at 11.50 p.m. in Train No. 6635 Kurla Express at Samalpatti in Dharmapuri District. Apart from the above said amount of Rs. 2 lakhs the applicants have also claimed a sum of Rs. 1,200/- for the loss of one brief case and further cash of Rs. 700/-. The said application was resisted by the Railway contending that as per the death list of passengers prepared during the accident and submitted by the Chief Medical Superintendent, Palghat, Southern Railway, the name of J. Sunil, son of the applicants was not found. However, they admitted that four dead bodies were remained unidentified as per the said list.

3. The Railway Claims Tribunal after considering the case of both parties came to the co





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top