1. Landlady who lost her case before the Appellate Authority, has come to this Court, challenging the legality and propriety of the judgment of the Appellate Authority.

2. Eviction petition was filed against the tenant on the ground that the building is required for the occupation of the landlady's daughter, Bhanumathi, who needs regular treatment and constant attention by her parents. The present space is insufficient to accommodate Bhanumathi and, therefore, the portion in the occupation of the tenant is required for the additional accommodation of the revision petitioner/landlady.

3. In defence, respondent contended that the building was let out to her for non-residential purpose. The present requirement of the landlady being residential, eviction cannot be ordered. At any rate, the claim is not bona fide.

4. Rent Controller, after taking evidence, came to the conclusion that the claim of the landlady is a genuine. He found that Bhanumathi, daughter of the landlady, is not having a building of her own, and she requires constant attention by her parents. He also found that even though the tenant is making use of the premises for non-residential purpose, since it is pa