M.KARPAGAVINAYAGAM
K. Perumal – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. By Inspector Of Police – Respondent
Key Points: - The accused was convicted under Section 304A IPC for causing death by rash and negligent driving. (!) - Eyewitness evidence, a sketch of the accident scene, and the rule of res ipsa loquitor were used to establish negligence. (!) - The High Court upheld the conviction but reduced the fine from Rs. 3,000 to Rs. 1,000 and clarified sentencing. (!) (!)
Mr. K. Perumal, the petitioner herein is the accused in a case filed under Section 304A I.P.C. for having caused the death of a cyclist Jayasundaram by rash and negligent driving. He was convicted to undergo R.I. for 3 months and to pay a fine of Rs. 1500/-, in default to suffer S.I. for 3 months, by the learned Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Kovilpatti. In the appeal, though the conviction was confirmed, the sentence of R.I. was set aside and fine of Rs. 3,000/- was imposed by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Tuticorin. As against the conviction, this revision has been filed before this Court.
2. Facts are these :- On 29-3-1992 at about 2.10 p.m. in the Kazhugumalai to Tenkasi Road P.W. 1 Jayaraj was going on a bicycle. His brother Jayasundaram, the deceased was also going on another cycle 20 feet away from him. At that time, the petitioner was driving a K.T.C. bus from Kovilpatti to Tenkasi at a great speed without sounding the horn. While so, the said bus hit against the cyclist Jayasundaram, with the result the victim fell down with serious injuries. On the way to hospital he died. P.W. 9, Sub-Inspector of Police registered a case under Section 304-A I.P.C. Afte
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.