SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Mad) 999

A.SUBBULAKSHMY, R.JAYASIMHA BABU
Shishir Kumar R. Mehta – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:P.P.S. Janarthana Raja, Mrs. Chitra Venkatraman, Advocates.

Judgment :-

SMT A. SUBBULAKSHMY, J.

The assessee is an individual. The assessment year is 1976-77. The assessee purchased 150 shares of Bank of Baroda on 17th January, 1972 for Rs. 15, 042.70. The Bank of Baroda was amalgamated with M/s Mahindra Ugine Steel Company Ltd. on 1st July, 1974. The shareholders of the Bank of Baroda were given option either to accept the shares of the transferee company or cash at the rate of Rs. 140 per share. The assessee exercised the option to receive cash and accordingly he received Rs. 21, 450 on 24th October, 1975. The difference between the amount and the cost of acquisition of those shares was assessed as short-term capital gains by the ITO. The assessee claimed that no capital gain is involved as it was a case of amalgamation. The claim so made was rejected by the ITO. Aggrieved by that order, the assessee preferred appeal before the AAC, who allowed the appeal. The AAC found that the transaction in the assessee's case did not fall within any limbs of s. 2(47) of the IT Act and the transaction did not involve transfer or sale or exchange or relinquishment. On appeal to the Tribunal, the Tribunal set aside the order of the AAC and restored the or




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top