SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Mad) 876

R.JAYASIMHA BABU, A.SUBBULAKSHMY
Commissioner of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
I. Miller and Company Limited – Respondent


Appearing Advocates: Mrs. Chitra Venkataraman, None.

Judgment :-

R. JAYASIMHA BABU, J.

The question raised at the instance of the Revenue which question arises out of the assessment of the income of the respondent-assessee for the asst. yr. 1962-63 is as to whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, and having regard to the terms of the agreement dated 15th December, 1961, the Tribunal was right in holding that the receipt of Rs. 50, 000 by the assessee-company for the use of the licence and trade mark 'Miller' by the Indian company was a capital receipt, and therefore, not taxable in the assessee's hands ?

2. The assessee is a foreign company which entered into agreements with Tube Investments Ltd. and later with T. I. Miller Ltd., Madras. These agreements were entered into in the year 1961. Under the agreement between the assessee and Tube Investment Ltd., it was provided that the assessee would receive a sum of Rs. 50, 000 from the company to be incorporated in the form of equity shares of that company as consideration for allowing that company as exclusive licence to use the trade mark 'Miller' over its products. The agreement also provided that the new company was not to use any mark other than the mark Miller. The







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top