SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Mad) 895

P.SATHASIVAM
P. E. Ramakrishnan – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Agricultural Income Tax and Others – Respondent


Appearing Advocates: Deokinandan Commissioner. K. M. L. Majele Assessee.

Judgment :-

P. SATHASIVAM, J.

The prayer in the above writ petition is to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the third respondent in Form No. 1 under section 8, namely, the distraint order in proceedings No. PAP/5/R/KDK, dated January 21, 1988, and quash the same and forbear the respondents from taking any proceedings against the petitioner in respect of the arrears of agricultural income-tax due by W. P. A. R. Ramamurthy or his legal representative.

According to the petitioner, one W. P. A. R. Ramamurthy owed several lakhs of rupees to V.R.V. and Company of Kumbakonam and its partners. The said V.R.V. and Company brought a suit against the said W. P. A. R. Ramamurthy in O.S. No. 717 of 1978 in the Sub-Court, Dindigul. Accordingly, the mortgaged properties were brought to sale in a court auction on January 11, 1984, and the petitioner bought the properties in the court auction for a sum of Rs. 1, 20, 105 subject to the mortgages mentioned in the sale deed executed by the court. The petitioner undertook to clear the encumbrances mentioned in the sale deed executed by the court. The said court auction was confirmed on July 3, 1984, and the learn


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top