1.Tenant in R.C.O.P.No.6 of 1993 on the file of Principal District Munsif, Dindugal is the Revision Petitioner. This revision petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India.

2. Respondent herein filed an eviction petition on the ground that the petitioner/tenant defaulted in payment of rent. In the counter statement, this allegation is denied. But when the matter came up for trial, parties settled the matter and on compromise, orders have been passed. Tenant was given 21 months time to vacate the premises and in case he fails to surrender vacant possession, landlord is allowed to take possession through Court. When the tenant did not surrender vacant possession by the end of the term, landlord filed an execution petition in E.P.197 of 1998 for getting possession of the building. An objection was filed in the lower court and the tenant wanted further six months time to surrender possession. Lower Court did not allow it and ordered delivery of the property. The same is challenged in this revision petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India.

3. One of the main grounds submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner is that the compromise itself is