SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Mad) 197

ABDUL HADI, N.V.BALASUBRAMANIAN
Commissioner of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Subramaniam Brothers – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:Mr. S. V. Subramanian, Advocate.

Judgment :-

N. V. BALASUBRAMANIAN, J.

Pursuant to the direction given by this court in T. C. P. No. 5 of 1982, dated April 26, 1982, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras, has stated a case and referred the following questions of law for the opinion of this court under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961

"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that the Income-tax Officer was not justified in disallowing a sum of Rs. 23, 293 being the commission paid to the retired partners while computing the income of the assessee-firm ?

2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal's view that the commission of Rs. 23, 293 received by the firm was not the income of the assessee-firm as there was overriding title in respect of such commission is sustainable in law ?" *

The facts relating to the case are as under : The assessee is a registered firm carrying on wholesale business in paper. During the previous year relevant to the assessment year 1974-75, the assessee consisted of four partners including one minor, who were admitted to the benefits of the partnership. Before the fir





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top