SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Mad) 369

K.A.SWAMI, RAJU
M. Parthasarathy – Appellant
Versus
Madurai Kamaraj University – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:N. Subramanian, Advocate.

Judgment :-

K. A. SWAMI, J.

This appeal is preferred against the order dated 18-7-1996 passed by the learned single Judge in W.P. No. 10120 of 1996, in which the petitioner sought for quashing the Notification No. 892/7 (sic) (Cr. P. C. and Prof. (96) dated 10-7-1996 issued by the respondent. The petitioner specifically prays that Clauses 1 and 6 of the said Notification be quashed and further prays for a direction to the respondent to conduct election to the Academic Council under Section 24(a), Clause II (4) of the Madurai Kamaraj University Act, after deleting Clauses 1 and 6 in the aforesaid Notification.

2. Sub-clause (4) of Section 25 of the Madurai Kamaraj University Act provides for filling up of the vacancies in the Academic Council, which reads thus :-

"One member from each post-graduate college who is not the Principal of such college elected by the teachers of the College including Physical Tutors, Demonstrators and Physicals Instructors from among the themselves. The duration of the office of three years."

This, the aforesaid provision does not make any distinction between the University College or a Private College affiliated to the University or aided or unaided college.





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top