D. RAJU, J.

The above writ appeal has been filed against the order of a learned single Judge of this Court dated 10-12-1990 in W.P. No. 6624 of 1986, whereunder the learned Judge thought fit that the orders dated 29-6-1984 and 31-1-1986 passed by the Electricity Board are liable to be and also were actually quashed. The proceedings dated 29-6-1984 is the one wherein the Superintending Engineer, Ramnad Electricity System, Madurai, called upon the writ petitioner-respondent to make additional security deposit of Rs. 30,000/- within the 30 days from the date of receipt of the said communication purporting to act so on the basis of the proceedings of the Electricity Board in .B.P. Ms. FS) No. 3 (Accounts Branch) dated 26-3-1984. Similarly, the proceedings dated 31-1-1986 is the one under which the Member/Distribution of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board informed the writ petitioner with reference to his letter dated 24-8-1985 that the service remains disconnected from 1/85 onwards and monthly charges levied also remains unpaid and if the writ petitioner-respondent fails to resume supply on payment of arrears and the additional security deposit immediately, the lines would be