SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Mad) 1264

N.V.BALASUBRAMANIAN, P.THANGAVEL
Commissioner of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Kumararani Smt. Meenakshi Ache – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:C. V. Rajan, Advocate.

Judgment :-

N.V. Balasubramanian, J.

In compliance with the directions of this Court dt. 15th Feb., 1983, the Tribunal, Madras, has stated a case and referred the following questions of law under s. 256(2) of the IT Act, 1961, for our opinion :

"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in cancelling the reassessment made under s. 147(b) of the IT Act for the asst. yr. 1972-73 ?

2- Whether, the Tribunal's view that there was no new information within the meaning of s. 147(b) of the IT Act for reopening of the assessment for the year 1972-73 is based on valid and relevant material and is sustainable in law ?

2. The assessee is an individual and the reference relates to the asst. yr. 1972-73 and during the previous year relevant to the assessment year the assessee has derived interest income which was chargeable under the heads, 'Interest on securities', 'House property', 'Capital gains' and 'Other sources'. The assessee during the previous year relevant to the asst. yr. 1972-73 borrowed a sum of Rs. 11.5 lakhs on 16th Oct., 1971, from the Canara Bank repayable with interest at 11.5 per cent p.a. on the said sum. The said sum was utilised by th




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top