SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Mad) 270

P.SATHASIVAM
Rengasami Angurar and Others – Appellant
Versus
Nacharammal and Others – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:K. Chandramouli Senior Counsel, G. K. Selvaraj Counsel, K.A. Ravindran Counsel, Advocates.

Judgment :-

The legal representatives of the defendant are the appellants in the above second appeal.

2. The first respondent herein filed O.S. No.311 of 1981 on the file of the District Munsif's Court, Pudukkottai for partition and separate possession. The averments in the plaint are as follows:- The plaintiff is the daughter of deceased Lakshaman Angurar. Her grandfather Valathan died long ago leaving his two sons namely Ramasami Angurar and Lakshmana Angurar. The defendant is the son of Ramasami Angurar. After the death of Valathan Angurar his properties were inherited by Ramasami Angurar and Lakshmana Angurar and were enjoyed by them jointly. Ramasami Angurar predeceased Lakshmana Angurar. Lakshmana Angurar left behind his wife Kasi Ammal who became entitled to the properties representing the undivided share of Lakshmana Angurar. Kasi Ammal died in or about 1969 leaving the plaintiff only. After the death of Lakshmana Angurar, the defendant and Kasi Ammal enjoyed the properties jointly. It is further contended that after the death of Kasi Ammal, the defendant had been giving the share of income to the plaintiff till about 1975. The plaintiff is in joint possession of the suit pr
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top