The 12th defendant in O. S. 133 of 1996 on the file of Sub Court, Trichy has filed this revision challenging the order of the lower Court in I. A. 202/96 whereby an ex parte interim Receiver was appointed.

2. The respondents 1 and 2 have filed the suit for dissolution of the partnership known as Srinivasa Transport (Firm)', for rendition of accounts by the third defendant in the said suit, for permanent injunction restraining the defendants 12 and 13 from alienating the buses bearing Registration Nos. TUC 9991, TDG 555 and TAY 977 and for other consequential reliefs. The plaintiffs have filed the suit contending that the plaintiffs and defendants 1 to 11 are partners of the partnership firm and the partnership was entered on 1-12-92. As per the terms of the partnership deed, the third defendant is the Managing Director of the partnership firm. The third defendant in collusion with the first and second defendants, who are his father and mother, had alienated the permits and the Registration Certificate relating to the aforesaid three business belonging to the partnership firm in favour of one Sri Srinivasa Transport (Firm) in which defendants 2 and 13 are partners. The l2