SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Mad) 518

JAGADISAN
Abdul Wahab – Appellant
Versus
Raman Panickar and Others – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:S. Parthasarathy, T. R. Rajagopalan, Senior Counsel For T. R. Rajaraman, Advocates.

Judgment :-

The plaintiff in O.S. 650/ 81 on the file of the District Munsif, Valangaiman at Kumbakonam is the petitioner in both the revisions. The defendants in the said suit are the respondents. The plaintiff filed the suit for partition to divide the property into two halves and allot one such share to him. The first defendant is entitled to other half share. The defendants 2 to 4 are the tenants. The other respondents are the legal representatives of the first defendant.

2. During the pendency of the suit I.A. 1546/ 84 was filed by the sixth respondent herein to appoint a court guardian for the first defendant. After medical evidence, the lower Court by order dt. 19-6-85 allowed the application for appointment of a guardian to the first defendant. The plaintiff has failed to take steps for the appointment of guardian for the first defendant. The Court below had passed an ex parte preliminary decree on 3-7-85.

3. Thereafter the petitioner herein filed I.A. 883/88 to bring the legal representatives of the deceased first defendant on record and I.A. 884/ 88 to pass a final decree pursuant to the preliminary decree dt. 3-7-85. The Court below had dismissed both the applications on t























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top