SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Mad) 534

THANIKKACHALAM
City Distributors – Appellant
Versus
State of Pondicherry – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:C. Natarajan, P. Krishnamurthy, Advocates.

Judgment :-

THANIKKACHALAM, J.

The assessee is City Distributors dealing in pan masala and cutlery items at FF-7, Krishna Vasan Building, 147, A. Madam Street, Pondicherry. For the assessment year 1972-73 the assessee claimed exemption on a turnover of Rs. 29, 05, 400, since the sales turnover of zarda is exempted from sales tax as per Schedule III, item 25 to the Pondicherry General Sales Tax Act, 1967. The assessee is selling zarda in the name Parag Zarda. According to the assessing officer, parag zarda is taxable at 3.5 per cent - single point - under section3(1) of the Pondicherry General Sales Tax Act. Hence the exemption claimed was not granted and the sales turnover of parag zarda was taxed at 3.5 per cent single point.

2. Aggrieved, the assessee filed an appeal before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner accepted the contention put forward by the assessee that zarda is exempted under entry No. 25 in Schedule III to the Act 6 of 1967 and accordingly deleted the addition. On a perusal of the order passed by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, the Secretary to the Government in-charge of the Commercial Tax Department by exercising his powe














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top