1996 Supreme(Mad) 722
High Court of Judicature at Madras
THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. K.A. SWAMI
R. Balasubramanian - Appellant
Versus
S. Subramaniam and Others - Respondents
W.A. No. 581/1996
Decided On : 19 July 1996
Headnote:
Vacancy - Headmaster Post - The vacancy in the post of Headmaster in an aided school was to be filled up as per Rule 15(4) of the Tamil Nadu Recognised Private Schools Regulation Rules, 1974, which specified the methods for appointments. The Rule mandated promotions based on merit and ability, with seniority considered only when merit and ability were approximately equal. If eligible teachers for promotion were not available, the School Committee had the option to fill the vacancy by direct recruitment after obtaining prior permission from the relevant authority. The Court held that the School Committee's action of filling the post by direct recruitment without obtaining prior permission and without determining the availability of eligible teachers for promotion was unauthorized and illegal, as it ignored the right conferred upon eligible teachers for promotion as Headmaster.
Fact of the Case:
Vacancy in the post of Headmaster arose in an aided school governed by the Tamil Nadu Recognised Private Schools (Regulation) Act, 1973 and the Tamil Nadu Recognised Private Schools Regulation Rules, 1974. The School Committee filled the vacancy by direct recruitment without obtaining prior permission and without determining the availability of eligible teachers for promotion as Headmaster.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that the School Committee's action of filling the post by direct recruitment without obtaining prior permission and without determining the availability of eligible teachers for promotion was unauthorized and illegal, as it ignored the right conferred upon eligible teachers for promotion as Headmaster.
Issues: Controversy regarding the application of Rules to aided schools, method of appointment to the post of Headmaster, and the legality of filling the vacancy by direct recruitment without obtaining prior permission and without determining the availability of eligible teachers for promotion.
Ratio Decidendi: The vacancy in the post of Headmaster was to be filled up as per Rule 15(4) of the Tamil Nadu Recognised Private Schools Regulation Rules, 1974, which mandated promotions based on merit and ability. The School Committee's action of filling the post by direct recruitment without obtaining prior permission and without determining the availability of eligible teachers for promotion was held unauthorized and illegal.
Final Decision: The Court dismissed the writ appeal, stating that the order of the learned single Judge did not call for interference, and observed that the post of Headmaster had to be filled up according to the Rules.
K.A. SWAMI, C.J.
Vacancy in the post of Headmaster arose in Sokkalal Higher Secondary School, Mukkudal, Tirunelveli Kattabomman District, which is an aided school. Therefore, it is governed by the Tamil Nadu Recognised Private Schools (Regulation) Act, 1973 and the Tamil Nadu Recognised Private Schools Regulation Rules, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Rules'). At certain point of time, there was a controversy as to whether the Rules did apply to the aided schools regarding recruitment. This was made clear by the State Government by issuance of G.O.Ms. No. 720 Education, dated April 28, 1991. That Government Order also raised a controversy and the matter was to be settled by the Full Bench of this Court in The Saliar Mahajana Hr. Sec. School v. The Joint Director of Schools (Hr. Sec.) etc., 1995 WLR 277 in which it was held that the Rules did apply to the private aided schools. Therefore, the vacancy in the post of Headmaster was to be filled up as per Rule 15(4) of the Rules. The said Rule reads thus : '(4)(i) Promotions shall be made on grounds of merit and ability, seniority being considered only when merit and ability are approximately equal. (ii) Appointments to the various categories of teachers shall be made in the following methods : (i) Promotion from among the qualified teachers in that school. (ii) If no qualified and suitable candidate is available by method (i) as above -
(a) appointment of other persons employed in that school, provided they are fully qualified to hold the post of teachers;
(b) appointment of teachers from any other school;
(c) Direct recruitment.
In the case of appointment from any other school or by direct recruitment, the School Committee shall obtain the prior permission of the District Educational Officers in respect of Pre-Primary, Primary and Middle School and that of the Chief Educational Officer in respect of High Schools, and Higher Secondary Schools, Teachers' Training Institutions setting out the reasons for such appointment. In respect of Corporate Body running more than one school, the School under that body shall be treated as one unit for purpose of this rule.(d) Appointment to the Post of Headmaster of Higher Secondary School shall be made by the method specified in clause (ii), either from the category of Headmasters of High Schools or Teachers' Training Institutes or from the category of Post Graduate Assistants in Academic subjects or Post Graduate Assistants in languages provided they possess the prescribed qualifications".
From sub-rule (4) of Rule 15 of the Rules, extracted above, it is clear that the vacancy to the Post of Headmaster has to be filled up by promotion. In the event, the teachers, eligible to be promoted as Headmaster, are not available, the School Committee has been given an option to fill up the vacancy by direct recruitment, also apart from other two modes as mentioned in clauses (a) and (b) of Rule 15 (4) (ii) after obtaining the prior permission of the District Educational Officer in respect of Pre-Primary, Primary and Middle School.
2. In the instant case, there is no such prior permission obtained nor there is any determination made by the School Committee that no eligible teacher is available for promotion as Headmaster. In the absence of any such decision by the School Committee and the permission prior obtained from the authority, as mentioned in-sub-rule (4) of Rule 15 of the Rules, the action taken by the School Committee to fill up the post by direct recruitment has to be held as unauthorised and illegal. The object of the Rule is to provide an opportunity to those teachers, who are already serving in the School, if eligible for promotion to the post of Headmaster. A right is conferred upon those teachers who are eligible to he considered for promotion as Headmaster and such a right cannot be ignored. The procedure followed by the school Committee, ignoring Rule 15(4) of the Rules, is illegal. The School Committee ought to have consider