SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Mad) 1187

M.KARPAGAVINAYAGAM
G. Gnanaiahpandiyan – Appellant
Versus
Pazhaniammal – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:Mr. V. Anantharaju, Mr. C. Pandarasamy, Advocates.

Judgment :-

This revision is directed against the order dated 13-2-1995, dismissing the petition in Crl. M.P. No. 3124 of 1994, filed by the petitioner/husband to set aside the ex parte order of maintenance passed in M.C. No. 7 of 1993, dated 23-11-1993, by the Judicial Magistrate No. 3, Srivilliputhur

2. The facts of this case involving a chequered history are quite agonizing

(i) The petitioner Gnanaiahpandiyan, a Police Constable, attached to Soonamedu Police Station, Chengai M.G.R. District, is the husband. The respondent Pazhaniammal of Cheithur village, Kamarajar District, is the unfortunate wife

(ii) The petitioner and the respondent got married on 24-1-1980 in a temple Arulmigu Thirukanneswarar Alayam, at Seithur, under Hindu rites in the presence of the elders of both the families. Some months later, the wife came to know that the petitioner/husband had illegal contact with several women. Ultimately, the wife was driven out from the matrimonial home, after subjecting her to cruelty. She came to the parent's home, eight years after the marriage. On coming to know that the petitioner herein married one Gowri, as second wife, the parents of the respondent herein reported to the p











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top