SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Mad) 1231

High Court of Judicature at Madras
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVARAJ PATIL
Salem Shevapet Silver and Katcha Exchange Brokers Association - Appellant
Versus
Supdt. of Customs Preventive, Salem - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 1091 of 1995
Decided On : 11 December 1996

Appearing Advocates:B. Kumar, K. Jayachandran, Advocates.

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court will not issue a Writ of Mandamus if the respondents have stated that they will adhere to the circular instructions relevant to the case.

Headnote:

Writ of Mandamus - Silver Bullions Seizure - The court found that the respondents had stated that they would adhere to the circular instructions contained in the circular dated 11-6-1990, and therefore, it was not necessary to issue a Writ of Mandamus as sought for by the petitioner association.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents not to search any business place of the members of the petitioner association for seizing any Silver Bullions without strictly adhering to norms prescribed in the circular of the third respondent dated 11-6-1990.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the respondents had stated that they would adhere to the circular instructions contained in the circular dated 11-6-1990, and therefore, it was not necessary to issue a Writ of Mandamus as sought for by the petitioner association.

Issues: The issue was whether the court should issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents not to search any business place of the members of the petitioner association for seizing any Silver Bullions without strictly adhering to norms prescribed in the circular of the third respondent dated 11-6-1990.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the specific statement made by the respondents in the counter affidavit that they are acting in accordance with the instructions contained in the circular dated 11-6-1990, and therefore, there was no controversy between the parties.

Final Decision: The court disposed of the Writ petition as it was not necessary to issue a Writ of Mandamus, considering the respondents' statement that they would adhere to the circular instructions contained in the circular dated 11-6-1990.

Judgment :-

Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2.The petitioner - Salem Shevapet Silver & Katcha Exchange Brokers Association, in this writ petition, has sought forWrit of Mandamusdirecting the respondents not to search any place of business of the members of the petitioner association for seizing any Silver Bullions without strictly adhering to norms prescribed in the circular of the third respondent dated 11-6-1990, and pass such other or further orders as deemed proper.

3.The respondents have filed counter affidavit. In paragraph 5 of the counter affidavit, the respondents have stated thus :-

"For the petitioners averment in para 8, it is submitted that the communication of the Ministry clearly provides that even though the silver bullions had been notified under Section 123 of Customs Act, 1962

4.The learned Counsel for the petitioners contended that all that the petitioners want is that the respondents should act strictly in accordance with the circular dated 11-6-1990 in the matter of search of any business place of the members of the association for seizing any silver bullions. In other words he submitted that the respondents cannot act against the instructions contained in the said Circular.

5.The learned Counsel for the respondents submitted that in the counter affidavit filed, various contentions raised by the petitioner in the writ petition have been met and the position is explained. He also pointed out that the respondents, in the counter affidavit filed, have stated specifically that the first respondent is scrupulously following the instructions contained in the Ministry's Letter No. F. 394/233/88. Cus. (As), dated 11-6-1990.

6.In the light of the specific statement made by the respondents in the counter affidavit that the respondents are acting in accordance with the instructions contained in the circular, dated 11-6-1990 referred to by the petitioners in the writ petition, I do not think it necessary to deal with the various other contentions raised in the writ petition, so also to refer to the other details given in the counter affidavit or the contentions raised therein for that matter. In view of this, I hardly see any controversy between the parties.

7.In the result, I pass the following order :-

In view of the statement made by the respondents that they shall adhere to the circular instructions contained in the circular, dated 11-6-1990, it is not necessary to issue anyWrit of Mandamusas sought for. The statement of the respondents is placed on record and accordingly the Writ petition is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top